CBL: DDA 18
deckerd@agcs.com
deckerd at agcs.com
Sun Aug 27 03:04:02 CEST 1995
Two minutes after sending the original message, I thought better
of some of my phrasing, to wit:
> There's also an essay wasting two pages with windy quack
> scholarly analysis of Barks's panel arrangements and shapes.
I apologize for using the word "quack," since the author of the
essay is a degreed academic and thus competent in his field. I
disagree strenuously with his analysis, and indeed with the
assumptions and ideology of the school of thought that gave rise
to it, but I don't mean to question his qualifications or
cast aspersions on his competency.
--Dwight Decker
More information about the DCML
mailing list