Families and backgrounds [was: Re: Whitman/Egmont [was: Re: AW: RE: US]]] -- indeed a very long subject

[Stefan Persson]

Sigvald Grøsfjeld jr. wrote:

> You seems to forget that $crooge's background and and family relations now
> have been to well documented for such new characters to fit well in.

Nope.  There are lots of ways such characters could fit in.  Look at the 
Rumpus case, for example.  The Rosa and Barks family trees do not state 
that the characters on those trees are *all* of Donald's and Scrooge's 
relatives, nor do they state the opposite.  Do you have any other 
references?

Stefan