Wild West and other things

[Fredrik Ekman]

Bjorn-Are Davidsen wrote:
>By the way: One of the really great thinks about Don's 
>stories (and that other guy's, called  Barks or something)
>is that they stimulate thoughts and discussions on 
>details, sources, plots, persons and world views (like
>that praiseworthy scene on the last page og Lo$9!).
>In fact, it's almost  like REAL literature... 

So, what's so unreal about comics? Why _shouldn't_ comics
be this way? After all, the only major difference between
comics and other litterature is that comics have pictures.
This shouldn't stop writers from making interesting/funny/
exciting/philosophical/litterary (pick any one or substitute
for your favourite) stories. Or..?

  /F